Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Marcus Boerger schrieb:
honestly why do you want to prefix iterators? and secondly i'd be
just plain stupid to prefix the exception classes.
Bugger, I forgot that those two (iterators and exceptions) are part of
SPL for a second. They're so essential, IMHO, that I
Wez Furlong schrieb:
> The "Oh my God!" meaning comes from the fuller phrase "Bugger me!";
> neither usage is appropriate for polite company.
Rest assured that I will never use that phrase again. Thanks for your
clarification!
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-ber
The "Oh my God!" meaning comes from the fuller phrase "Bugger me!";
neither usage is appropriate for polite company.
--Wez.
On 9/15/05, Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Bergmann schrieb:
> > Bugger, I forgot that those two
>
> Just to clarify for those who do not know t
Sebastian Bergmann schrieb:
> Bugger, I forgot that those two
Just to clarify for those who do not know that "Bugger" can be used a
phrase along the lines of "Oh my God!": I did not call Marcus a bugger,
which would be, given certain meanings of the word as a noun, really bad
name calling.
--
Marcus Boerger schrieb:
> honestly why do you want to prefix iterators? and secondly i'd be
> just plain stupid to prefix the exception classes.
Bugger, I forgot that those two (iterators and exceptions) are part of
SPL for a second. They're so essential, IMHO, that I thought them part
of the
Hello Sebastian,
honestly why do you want to prefix iterators? and secondly i'd be just
plain stupid to prefix the exception classes. In the end we should move
the exception classes into the engine anyways. But who cares what i say
marcus
Thursday, September 15, 2005, 2:08:53 PM, you wrote
Hello Andi, hello Zeev,
MFH and change towards class constants is done. The only part being new
inside SPL now is the ability of spl's autoload to work with non static
loader methods. Do you think i should move that into 5.1 as well?
regards
marcus
Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 9:55:32 PM, yo
Hello Sebastian,
yeah uys piss me off :-)
Thursday, September 15, 2005, 2:08:53 PM, you wrote:
> Edin Kadribasic schrieb:
>> Now, you claim they cannot be renamed due to the BC concerns
> I think we should break BC for PHP 5.1 and prefix the existing classes
> with SPL. This is better than
Edin Kadribasic schrieb:
> Now, you claim they cannot be renamed due to the BC concerns
I think we should break BC for PHP 5.1 and prefix the existing classes
with SPL. This is better than the current state in HEAD and PHP_5_1
which is inconsistent.
Hopefully we will have namespaces in PHP 6.
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Edin,
>
> well imho it makes no sense to prefix all the iterators with Spl and also
> most of them are released already with 5.0. Changing those is to big of a BC
> issue isn't it? I mean it is different from changing a few consts very
> rarely used to class consts.
On 14.09.2005 15:20, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Any last minute additions to 5.1.0RC2 or can we roll it?
If it's not too late I'd like to fix http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34505
before RC2.
It'll require addition of zend_unmangle_property_name_ex() and changing
several files to use it instead of z
On 9/14/05, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No NEW problems on Solaris 9, only with latest 5.1 snapshot:
>
> * "make test" still does not work
> * "make install" fails because some PEAR components are missing (see
> mail of Pierre)
Uwe, _you_ have to do it while testing from CVS :)
Se
Hello Edin,
well imho it makes no sense to prefix all the iterators with Spl and also
most of them are released already with 5.0. Changing those is to big of a BC
issue isn't it? I mean it is different from changing a few consts very
rarely used to class consts.
marcus
Wednesday, September 14,
Hello Andi,
ok, i am on it right now (the one answer was from today, i received it
while i was typing the other).
regards
marcus
Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 9:55:32 PM, you wrote:
> I am sure I answered but I see Zeev has now (pretty much what I answered too
> :)
> At 07:39 AM 9/14/2005,
I am sure I answered but I see Zeev has now (pretty much what I answered too :)
At 07:39 AM 9/14/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Zeev,
i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces
an
All fixed now.
--Jani
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Uwe Schindler wrote:
At 16:18 14.09.2005, you wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Uwe Schindler wrote:
* "make test" still does not work
Like..how?
I posted this one month ago (other thread).
It fails when calling "test" with an empty ex
Hello Jessie,
well the best solution would be to drop the 'Spl' prefix for 5.1 and wait
for namespaces since they are imo the only solution.
marcus
Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 5:34:45 PM, you wrote:
> I agree with Edin. To be consistent, either all interfaces and classes
> should be prefi
> What is current status of a patch? It will be included?
I really hope so (for PHP6, that is). Andi said he'd have a look at the
patch some time ago. I'd love to know what he and the others "in charge"
think about this matter.
- David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Jessie Hernandez wrote:
This is one case where namespaces are useful. With my namespace patch, all
that would have to be done is to name the class as SPL:Observer. Users can
either implement SPL:Observer or first "import SPL:Observer;" and then
implement Observer.
Yes, this is a right task fo
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Uwe Schindler wrote:
At 16:18 14.09.2005, you wrote:
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
gmake: [test] Error 1 (ignored)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/install/php5-200509141230$
Do you know why this happens? :)
(in Makefile, remove the -@ from the line below test:)
* configur
I agree with Edin. To be consistent, either all interfaces and classes
should be prefixed or none should be prefixed. On the other hand, prefixing
all the old classes/interfaces will cause BC breaks.
This is one case where namespaces are useful. With my namespace patch, all
that would have to be
Hello Zeev,
phew i take a deep breathe and give my best
marcus
Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 4:45:32 PM, you wrote:
> At 17:39 14/09/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Hello Zeev,
>>
>> i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
>>replied so far. Question is whet
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Zeev,
>
> i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
> replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces
> and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL
> and instead provide
At 16:18 14.09.2005, you wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Uwe Schindler wrote:
* "make test" still does not work
Like..how?
I posted this one month ago (other thread).
It fails when calling "test" with an empty expression:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/install/php5-200509141230$ gmake test
Build com
At 17:39 14/09/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Zeev,
i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces
and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL
and inst
Hello Zeev,
i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces
and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL
and instead provide class constants whcih we can do r
Yep, Observer and friends should be renamed to Spl*.
At 04:20 AM 9/14/2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Any last minute additions to 5.1.0RC2 or can we roll it?
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Run
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Uwe Schindler wrote:
* "make test" still does not work
Like..how?
* configure prints out a lot of garbage when testing for bison (which is
missing on my solaris machine)
And the garbage is..?
--Jani
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
No NEW problems on Solaris 9, only with latest 5.1 snapshot:
* "make test" still does not work
* "make install" fails because some PEAR components are missing (see
mail of Pierre)
* configure prints out a lot of garbage when testing for bison (which
is missing on my solaris machine)
Uwe
At 1
Any last minute additions to 5.1.0RC2 or can we roll it?
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
30 matches
Mail list logo
