It's a bug, but not critical.
--Wez.
On 7/15/05, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > I rerolled Beta 3 due to some critical patches that needed to make it in.
> > Please download and give a sanity test. If no new critical bug is found
> > I'll put it up this evening o
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I rerolled Beta 3 due to some critical patches that needed to make it in.
Please download and give a sanity test. If no new critical bug is found
I'll put it up this evening or tomorrow.
I might be too late, here, but when building:
./configure --with-mssql --with-pdo-dblib
I rerolled Beta 3 due to some critical patches that needed to make it in.
Please download and give a sanity test. If no new critical bug is found
I'll put it up this evening or tomorrow.
Edin, please roll Windows.
http://snaps.php.net/~andi/
Thanks,
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop
> Thanks as usual to Edin for the quick turnaround on the
> Windows builds.
+4,294,967,295
Best,
Mike Robinson
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Beta 3 is in CVS of phpweb and already on most servers. I will post it
tomorrow if no serious show stoppers are found. Please just sanity check.
We will now enter a feature freeze and hopefully have our first release
candidate as planned within a couple of weeks.
http://www.php.net/get/php-5.1.0
Hi Andi,
On 17 Dec 2003, at 23:12, Andi Gutmans wrote:
If there aren't any beta show stoppers (i.e. it doesn't format your
harddrive) I'll re-roll final beta 3 tomorrow
it formatted my harddrive, erm no. But see:
http://jan.prima.de/~jan/php_test_results_20031217_2353.txt (MacOS X.3)
http://jan.pr
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 11:04 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >
> > > Are these OK too? That's on www.php.net.
> > > buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok)
> > > buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok)
> >
> >Versions are
OK, I re-rolled on snaps. I think we should address this issue in the
future because it doesn't make sense that we can only roll one specific
machine because it has some libtool patch.
You can download the tars from http://snaps.php.net/~andi
If there aren't any beta show stoppers (i.e. it doesn'
At 11:04 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Are these OK too? That's on www.php.net.
> buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok)
> buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok)
Versions are ok, but you need the patched libtool from snaps.php.net.
Any chance w
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Are these OK too? That's on www.php.net.
> buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok)
> buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok)
Versions are ok, but you need the patched libtool from snaps.php.net.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing Li
At 11:01 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Ouch :)
> I was sure cvs.php.net works for rolling RCs (I know my machine doesn't).
> I'll re-roll tomorrow morning.
> Can someone tell me which php.net machine is updated with all of the right
> version
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Ouch :)
> I was sure cvs.php.net works for rolling RCs (I know my machine doesn't).
> I'll re-roll tomorrow morning.
> Can someone tell me which php.net machine is updated with all of the right
> versions of autoconf/libtool and so on?
snaps.php.net
Der
Ouch :)
I was sure cvs.php.net works for rolling RCs (I know my machine doesn't).
I'll re-roll tomorrow morning.
Can someone tell me which php.net machine is updated with all of the right
versions of autoconf/libtool and so on?
Jani, see why I needed an RC1 :)
Andi
At 10:43 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, D
Please give the tar ball a short sanity check to see that it builds fine.
You can get it at http://cvs.php.net/~andi/
I'll re-roll B3 in the morning (10 hours from now) unless I hear of
something critical.
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http:
#22510 is refixed. The other one is not a real issue (it died out right
before, now it runs till the end - we'll try to fix the leaks though).
Zeev
At 17:49 17/12/2003, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On December 16, 2003 11:23 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> A couple of weeks too late, but I'd
On December 16, 2003 11:23 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> A couple of weeks too late, but I'd like to roll Beta 3 tomorrow.
> The crucial bug we wanted fixing (the return reference problem) was fixed.
> Other little things can be fixed during the code freeze after B3 whilst
> getting ready
Hey guys,
A couple of weeks too late, but I'd like to roll Beta 3 tomorrow.
The crucial bug we wanted fixing (the return reference problem) was fixed.
Other little things can be fixed during the code freeze after B3 whilst
getting ready for RC1.
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development M
>Derick Rethans wrote:
>> From what I saw more people don't want those
>>suckyCaps .
>
>Sorry Derick, but it seems that more people want
>studlyCaps in
>Object-Oriented PHP and underscores in procedural
PHP.
>Cristiano Duarte
It would make more sense.
As was mentioned before, OO parts of PHP in
Derick Rethans wrote:
> From what I saw more people don't want those suckyCaps .
Sorry Derick, but it seems that more people want studlyCaps in
Object-Oriented PHP and underscores in procedural PHP.
Cristiano Duarte
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On 12/4/03 12:28 AM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Can we aim for a definitive 9th December (my birthday)? After Beta 3 we
would then code freeze and prepare for RC1.
I am cool with the Beta 3 date, but I think it would be helpful if we
could get a
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:14:06 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From what I saw more people don't want those suckyCaps .
Que?
pierre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> tracked because of the whole __toString() issue. Now it's resolved and
> SimpleXML still works like a charm I'd like to aim for Beta 3 next week
> (including the StudlyCaps standard adoption).
>From what I saw more people don't want those suckyCaps .
Der
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Can we aim for a definitive 9th December (my birthday)? After Beta 3 we
> would then code freeze and prepare for RC1.
I would really like to see the shutdown order fixed before beta. It's
something quite vital to the whole dtors thingy.
Derick
--
PHP I
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Can we aim for a definitive 9th December (my birthday)? After Beta 3 we
> would then code freeze and prepare for RC1.
I am cool with the Beta 3 date, but I think it would be helpful if we
could get a list of patches and new features people are planning to
Hey,
Beta 3 was supposed to be released on the 30th of November but got side
tracked because of the whole __toString() issue. Now it's resolved and
SimpleXML still works like a charm I'd like to aim for Beta 3 next week
(including the StudlyCaps standard adoption).
Can we aim for a definitive 9
Hey guys n' girls,
Just reminding you that Beta 3 is 12 days off so finish off stuff you want
to have in there.
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
26 matches
Mail list logo
