On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> PHP 5.2 branch is really for bug fixes only, so new functionality
> should be introduced into it.
+not
:)
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing Lis
PHP 5.2 branch is really for bug fixes only, so new functionality
should be introduced into it.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
> Can I get an affirmation if the pdo dblib code will be accepted in 5.2
> and 5.3 branches?
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development M
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 07:11 -0700, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
> Can I get an affirmation if the pdo dblib code will be accepted in 5.2
> and 5.3 branches?
In general bug fixes should go to all active branches. Right now these
are 5.2, 5.3 and trunk. Right now 5.2 and 5.3 are in RC so only
"critical"
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
>> That's not correct. PHP 5.3+ has no SqlServer support on Windows. The
>> SqlSrv driver is more than welcome as it solves this problem. The PDO
>> support is still beta (CTP2). However all other platforms do have
>> SqlServer support by d
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Stanley Sufficool
> wrote:
>
>> I would argue that the additional fixes in trunk fix bugs rather than
>> introducing new functionality since they were already in the PDO
>> specification and they do not
hi,
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
> I would argue that the additional fixes in trunk fix bugs rather than
> introducing new functionality since they were already in the PDO
> specification and they do not break BC. I do not see why this would be
> held out of releases.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Christopher Jones
wrote:
>
>
> On 07/02/2010 07:11 AM, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
>>
>> Can I get an affirmation if the pdo dblib code will be accepted in 5.2
>> and 5.3 branches?
>>
>
> It shouldn't go into 5.2 if it introduces new functionality. You
> might backpor
On 07/02/2010 07:11 AM, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
Can I get an affirmation if the pdo dblib code will be accepted in 5.2
and 5.3 branches?
It shouldn't go into 5.2 if it introduces new functionality. You
might backport the crash/leak bug fixes if Ilia is OK with that.
Depending if how compa
>-Original Message-
>From: kalle@gmail.com [mailto:kalle@gmail.com] On
>Behalf Of Kalle Sommer Nielsen
>Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 7:17 AM
>To: Stanley Sufficool
>Cc: PHP internals list; pdo
>Subject: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO DBLIB Release Candidate?
>
&
Hi Stanley
2010/7/2 Stanley Sufficool :
> Can I get an affirmation if the pdo dblib code will be accepted in 5.2
> and 5.3 branches?
You need to talk to each of the release masters for this. If the
merges contains new features then it shouldn't go into 5.2, like the
LastInsertId you recently did.
Can I get an affirmation if the pdo dblib code will be accepted in 5.2
and 5.3 branches?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
11 matches
Mail list logo