On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Here is a pretty simple patch that will provide the indicated function. If no
one objects I'll commit it to 5.3/6 branches in the next day or two.
This patch builds cleanly against 5.2.8 in FreeBSD ports!
I'll shoot you an e-mail from my work acco
On 30-Dec-08, at 10:21 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 30.12.2008 18:15, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
What is the benefit of the new API, documents better, has a longer
name, helps some fuzzing suit to determine if functions take args or
not?
It produces much better & verbose error messages error mes
On 30.12.2008 18:15, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> What is the benefit of the new API, documents better, has a longer
> name, helps some fuzzing suit to determine if functions take args or
> not?
It produces much better & verbose error messages error messages.
Take a look at these for example:
5_3
What is the benefit of the new API, documents better, has a longer
name, helps some fuzzing suit to determine if functions take args or
not?
Also, is this documented anywhere?
On 30-Dec-08, at 4:31 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 30.12.2008 03:24, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There is nothing wro
The gethostname() is a POSIX function and therefor should be available
on windows as well as any other posix complaint system. The
php_uname() function uses a radically different code between Win32 and
Linux and therefor is not guaranteed to return the same equivalents,
if win32 supports (w
On 30.12.2008 03:24, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with using WRONG_PARAM_COUNT, it worked in the
> past and still works fine and quite a bit of code still uses it.
True, but we're trying to get rid of it, so please use new parameter
parsing API when adding new functions.
Tha
hi,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Kalle wrote:
> Hi Ilia
>
> Den 30/12/2008 kl. 00.30 skrev Ilia Alshanetsky :
>
>> Here is a pretty simple patch that will provide the indicated function. If
>> no one objects I'll commit it to 5.3/6 branches in the next day or two.
>>
>>
>
> You should use ze
Isn't this whole function the same as calling php_uname('n') ?
According to gethostname()'s manpage on Linux:
The GNU C library implements gethostname() as a library function that
calls uname(2) and copies up to len bytes from the returned nodename
field into name.
php_uname('n') is already imp
Ilia Alshanetsky escribió:
> + char buf[4096];
Shouldnt that be
char buf[HOST_NAME_MAX + 1] ?
--
"We have art in order not to die of the truth" - Friedrich Nietzsche
Cristian Rodríguez R.
Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development
http://www.opens
There is nothing wrong with using WRONG_PARAM_COUNT, it worked in the
past and still works fine and quite a bit of code still uses it.
The code itself should work on windows, if the define for the function
is specified.
On 29-Dec-08, at 7:00 PM, Kalle wrote:
Hi Ilia
Den 30/12/2008 kl. 0
Hi Ilia
Den 30/12/2008 kl. 00.30 skrev Ilia Alshanetsky :
Here is a pretty simple patch that will provide the indicated
function. If no one objects I'll commit it to 5.3/6 branches in the
next day or two.
You should use zend_parse_parameters_none() here.
I have no test env here, but do
Here is a pretty simple patch that will provide the indicated
function. If no one objects I'll commit it to 5.3/6 branches in the
next day or two.
Index: ext/standard/dns.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/ext/standard/dns.c,v
r
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 16:26, Brian A. Seklecki
wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Is anyone interested in adding POSIX 1003.1-2001 gethostname(2) support? I'm
> interested in sponsoring a small contract development initiative.
>
> I need something more reliable than $_ENV[]. Not all shells export
> $HOSTNAME
13 matches
Mail list logo
