Can we just use PHP7 instead of PHPNG in the wiki, that might be misleading.
On 11 February 2015 at 01:03, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Xinchen Hui in php.internals (Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:49:43 +0800):
> >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> >> https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading
> [sni
Xinchen Hui in php.internals (Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:49:43 +0800):
>On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading
[snip]
>> ib_link = (ibase_db_link *)zend_fetch_resource2(Z_RES_P(link_arg),
>> link_id, LE_LINK, le_link, le_plink);
>>
>> But this is only a
> De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo
> Ohgaki
>
> Basic stuff should be in source. IMO.
> Perhaps, we should use only the Wiki for additional internal stuff from now
> on.
+1. Documenting Zend API in docbook format is unrealistic. The whole ' PHP at
the Core' ch
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Maciej Sobaczewski wrote:
> I'm totally aware that those files are tend to be more up-to-date thanks
> to placing them directly where core developers work. However, we have wiki
> pages for internals stuff, so why not move it to the manual and provide
>
Hey:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf in php.internals (Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:28:37 -0500):
>>We have had quite a number of changes to the extension API and it
>>worries me a little bit how long it will take everyone to get their
>>extensions ported. We have UPGR
Hello Jan,
An annotated diff would be very welcome! But more or less complete
documentation as well.
Jan
What about placing such informations in the section of PHP manual like
http://php.net/manual/en/internals2.php (for ZE3, of course). I suspect
that writing regular text files in repo or
Rasmus Lerdorf in php.internals (Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:28:37 -0500):
>We have had quite a number of changes to the extension API and it
>worries me a little bit how long it will take everyone to get their
>extensions ported. We have UPGRADING.INTERNALS which still needs some
>love, but even if that c
