On Feb 10, 2015 3:25 AM, "Stanislav Malyshev" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > constraints. Type check is one of them. There are many people argue
"This
> > language is secure and robust because it has _static_ types".
>
> These people are wrong. Languages can't really be secure or robust, only
> code impleme
Hi Stas,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> > constraints. Type check is one of them. There are many people argue "This
> > language is secure and robust because it has _static_ types".
>
> These people are wrong. Languages can't really be secure or robust, only
> code
Hi!
> constraints. Type check is one of them. There are many people argue "This
> language is secure and robust because it has _static_ types".
These people are wrong. Languages can't really be secure or robust, only
code implemented in these languages can, and we have witnessed many
examples of
Hi all,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Lowrey wrote:
>
>> First, let me say that I have voted against the current scalar types RFC.
>> Please do not let that color your evaluation of the rest of this message
>> ...
>>
>> I want to go
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Lowrey wrote:
> First, let me say that I have voted against the current scalar types RFC.
> Please do not let that color your evaluation of the rest of this message
> ...
>
> I want to go on record (for the n-th time) as being unhappy about any
>
First, let me say that I have voted against the current scalar types RFC.
Please do not let that color your evaluation of the rest of this message ...
I want to go on record (for the n-th time) as being unhappy about any
proposal that forces me to use php.ini. IMHO if it doesn't work with `$ php
-
Hi Francois,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:43 AM, François Laupretre
wrote:
> > De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo
> Ohgaki
> >
> > Since people's preferences are diverse. It might be a good idea having
> pre-vote
> > for designs, then we may have final vote with s
> De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo Ohgaki
>
> Since people's preferences are diverse. It might be a good idea having
> pre-vote
> for designs, then we may have final vote with single design.
>
> We need some consensuses even for pre-vote.
>
> What do you think?
Hi Guilherme and Francois,
Could you give your ideas for these?
Thank you.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi Dimitry, Francois and Guilherme,
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
>> Hi Yasuo,
>>
>> Following our c
Hi Dimitry, Francois and Guilherme,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Yasuo,
>
> Following our conversation, I tried to imagine how DbC should look like in
> PHP from user perspective. Finally, I was influenced by the semantic
> proposed in D, and syntax proposed for Java
On 2015-02-05, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> --001a11c20e52da1ee0050e556679
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Yasuo,
>
> Following our conversation, I tried to imagine how DbC should look like in
> PHP from user perspective. Finally, I was influenced by the semantic
> proposed in D, and sy
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for your time!
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Following our conversation, I tried to imagine how DbC should look like in
> PHP from user perspective. Finally, I was influenced by the semantic
> proposed in D, and syntax proposed for Java. So, these a
James Crane wrote:
I've been reading and I discovered a concept called Design By
Contract. I've not seen any particular libraries to aid in this
particular development design process, but I was wondering if you
folks had, or if there were plans to consider providing for this
functionality within
13 matches
Mail list logo
