To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: I quit.
The 0.1 RFC version was mentioned a lot as a good compromise by many
people and had major support.
Any proposal to the scalar hints problem that doesn't definitively
error
out in
the `(int) apple` case is a non-starter
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.com
wrote:
This bickering already jeopardized the type hinting RFC's how many times?
3 as I recall?
Zeev was kind enough to reach out privately prior to your message and we
began exchanged mails trying to better understand
Am Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:00:41 +0200
schrieb Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.com:
Hallo,
Right now we need a breakthrough event - get type hints into the language
at all. The most sensible thing to do it is to add basic type hints that
work like the current conversion rules, maybe add some
The 0.1 RFC version was mentioned a lot as a good compromise by many
people and had major support.
People keep saying this like it's a thing, but I and others are vehemently
opposed to this as a solution. The only thing weak hints accomplishes is
the illusion of safety without actually
-Original Message-
From: rdlow...@gmail.com [mailto:rdlow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Daniel Lowrey
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 5:13 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: I quit.
The 0.1 RFC version was mentioned a lot as a good compromise by many
people
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: rdlow...@gmail.com [mailto:rdlow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Daniel Lowrey
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 5:13 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: I quit
