On 2010-03-16, Derick Rethans wrote:
> - Declare 5.2 security fixes only (Something for Ilia to declare).
> - Declare 5.3 bug fixes only (and ini-mini features if so desired)
> (Something for Johannes to declare).
>
> Once that's done, I'd like to:
>
> - Recreate trunk from the 5.3 branch.
>
>
> The point is that, for instance, PHP 5.3 was not a trivial upgrade for coders
> or hosters. Sure it's mostly compatible, and you certainly can write code
> that works from 5.0->5.3 just fine, and if not then you're probably doing
> something wrong... but that's most of the PHP code out there
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 17:10, David Soria Parra wrote:
> On 2010-03-16, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> - Declare 5.2 security fixes only (Something for Ilia to declare).
>> - Declare 5.3 bug fixes only (and ini-mini features if so desired)
>> (Something for Johannes to declare).
>>
>> Once that's do
On 3/19/10 1:31 PM, Nate Abele wrote:
The point is that, for instance, PHP 5.3 was not a trivial upgrade for coders or
hosters. Sure it's mostly compatible, and you certainly can write code that works
from 5.0->5.3 just fine, and if not then you're probably doing something
wrong... but that's
On 2010.03.19. 19:31, Nate Abele wrote:
The point is that, for instance, PHP 5.3 was not a trivial upgrade for coders or
hosters. Sure it's mostly compatible, and you certainly can write code that works
from 5.0->5.3 just fine, and if not then you're probably doing something
wrong... but that
On 2010.03.19. 19:50, la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
On 3/19/10 1:31 PM, Nate Abele wrote:
The point is that, for instance, PHP 5.3 was not a trivial upgrade
for coders or hosters. Sure it's mostly compatible, and you certainly
can write code that works from 5.0->5.3 just fine, and if not then
yo
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Pas wrote:
> On 2010.03.19. 19:50, la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
>
>> On 3/19/10 1:31 PM, Nate Abele wrote:
>>
>>> The point is that, for instance, PHP 5.3 was not a trivial upgrade
for coders or hosters. Sure it's mostly compatible, and you certainly
ca
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> It seems that the
> "Implement David's Circular Garbage collection patch" was not merged into
> 5.3, I think it should be a good feature for 5.4
Uh, yes it was. It's most definitely in 5.3.
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like X
sorry, my bad.
Tyrael
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> > It seems that the
> > "Implement David's Circular Garbage collection patch" was not merged into
> > 5.3, I think it should be a good feature for 5.4
>
> Uh, yes it was.
