Hello Cristiano,
Wednesday, August 6, 2003, 3:19:34 PM, you wrote:
CD> Simeon Koptelov wrote:
>> Hello Cristiano,
>>
>> Here's why i think that interface is not good solution.
>>
>> We need the toString method like java's one to
>> safely assume that _every_ object has the string representation
switch/case removed and patch attached. Is it ok?
Should the method be named "to_string()", "tostring()" or "__tostring()" ?
According to the current Coding Standard document.. it should be
toString() : even though php is not Case-sensitive:)..
Would be nice to see this work..
Regards
Alan
Do y
Hello Marcus,
Did you think of a better interface name instead of "Printable" ?
Do you think Zeev or Andi will accept this patch ?
Cristiano.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
"Alan Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >What about __construct, __destruct and __clone ?
AK> these are built in. - and done to avoid conflicts.
All right.
> >Shouldn't it be named
> >__to_string() or __tostring() ?
> >
AK> since you implicitly make this
Simeon Koptelov wrote:
Hello Cristiano,
Here's why i think that interface is not good solution.
We need the toString method like java's one to
safely assume that _every_ object has the string representation. This
means we can say $obj1->toString() and $obj2->toString() and don't
care if $obj1 and
Hi all,
SK> Maybe it will be better to have this method in all classes and define
SK> default behavior such as existing ( string )$object cast?
I guess that using an interface is better. But if the guys here think
different I would revert to the patch with no interfaces.
AK> According to the curr
AK> According to the current Coding Standard document.. it should be
AK> toString() : even though php is not Case-sensitive:)..
What about __construct, __destruct and __clone ?
these are built in. - and done to avoid conflicts.
Shouldn't it be named
__to_string() or __tostring() ?
since you imp
Hello Cristiano,
Saturday, August 9, 2003, 10:48:22 PM, you wrote:
CD> Hello Marcus,
CD> Did you think of a better interface name instead of "Printable" ?
CD> Do you think Zeev or Andi will accept this patch ?
I guess they won't like it and i would agree. I'd like to see something that
hooks in
Hello Cristiano,
Here's why i think that interface is not good solution.
We need the toString method like java's one to
safely assume that _every_ object has the string representation. This
means we can say $obj1->toString() and $obj2->toString() and don't
care if $obj1 and $obj2 do support this
Hi Marcus,
"Marcus BöRger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CD> I don't know how to throw an error/exception from inside the core of
Zend2.
> CD> I have some code to throw an exception/error from extensions...
>
> Simply set EG(exception) = class...
> and experime
Hello Cristiano,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 4:45:20 AM, you wrote:
CD> Hello Marcus,
>> CD> switch/case removed and patch attached. Is it ok?
>> CD> Should the method be named "to_string()", "tostring()" or "__tostring()" ?
>> CD> Do you commit it to CVS ?
>>
>> No. Last Problem i see is that even
Hello Simeon,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 2:33:00 PM, you wrote:
SK> Hello Cristiano,
SK> Monday, August 4, 2003, 8:45:20 AM, you wrote:
>>> CD> Should the method be named "to_string()", "tostring()" or
CD>> "__tostring()" ?
SK> Maybe the __tostring() will be the best because few naming
SK> conven
Hello Cristiano,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 8:45:20 AM, you wrote:
>> CD> Should the method be named "to_string()", "tostring()" or
CD> "__tostring()" ?
Maybe the __tostring() will be the best because few naming
conventions for methods exist. Some people prefer C-like some_method(), some
like Java-
Hello Marcus,
> CD> switch/case removed and patch attached. Is it ok?
> CD> Should the method be named "to_string()", "tostring()" or
"__tostring()" ?
> CD> Do you commit it to CVS ?
>
> No. Last Problem i see is that even when to_string() is available the
default
> behavior can get called that se
Hello Cristiano,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 12:34:23 AM, you wrote:
CD> "Marcus BöRger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
CD> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> They are simply other types of function just don't care
CD> call_user_function_ex()
>> will take care of the differences. In other words you
"Marcus BöRger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> They are simply other types of function just don't care
call_user_function_ex()
> will take care of the differences. In other words you won't need
swicth/case.
switch/case removed and patch attached. Is it ok?
Shoul
Hello Cristiano,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 12:10:26 AM, you wrote:
CD> Hi Marcus,
>> Not good enough it seems :-(
CD> I'll get there... ;-)
>> Some comments:
>> - Please always start with tabs, you used spaces to begin lines.
CD> done.
seems like :-)
>> - TSRMLS_FETCH() is a variable declaratio
Hi Marcus,
> Not good enough it seems :-(
I'll get there... ;-)
> Some comments:
> - Please always start with tabs, you used spaces to begin lines.
done.
> - TSRMLS_FETCH() is a variable declaration, so it cannot be used inside a
> function.
If I wipe TSRMLS_FETCH() out, I get this error:
/usr
Hello Cristiano,
Sunday, August 3, 2003, 9:54:55 PM, you wrote:
CD> I read README.SUBMITING_PATCH and attached the patch as specified.
Not good enough it seems :-(
Some comments:
- Please always start with tabs, you used spaces to begin lines.
- TSRMLS_FETCH() is a variable declaration, so it c
I read README.SUBMITING_PATCH and attached the patch as specified.
Cristiano Duarte
"Cristiano Duarte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >"Marcus BöRger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > The patch doesn't compile (always use
>"Marcus BöRger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The patch doesn't compile (always use confugure --enable-maintainer-zts).
> Then you assume that every class has a function to_string(), this is not
what
> we want.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Marcus
So, being the author of the C-level cast_object(), I thought about
exposing this at one time. I decided against it mainly because I needed
it for simplexml, and I didn't want an internals decision to be clouded
by userspace discussions (how's my whitespace btw?)
I really like the idea of PHP havi
Hello Cristiano,
Sunday, August 3, 2003, 5:33:25 AM, you wrote:
CD> I made a patch to the latest PHP5-CVS wich implements this hook. I think
CD> it's useful to make a meaningful object stringfied value.
CD> Can anyone verify it and maybe commit it to CVS ?
CD> --- zend.c 2003-07-30 14:07:36.000
I made a patch to the latest PHP5-CVS wich implements this hook. I think
it's useful to make a meaningful object stringfied value.
Can anyone verify it and maybe commit it to CVS ?
--- zend.c 2003-07-30 14:07:36.0 -0300
+++ zend.c.new 2003-08-03 00:27:43.0 -0300
@@ -227,10 +227,24
Sorry guys,
> $o = new xxx();
should be $o = new my_object();
And if there is a way to hook into zend_standard_class (stdClass) what would
make all objects inherit the to_string method, it would be great !
Cristiano Duarte
"Cristiano Duarte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem
news:[EMAIL
25 matches
Mail list logo
