Hi Niels!
On 18.07.2024 at 14:44, Niels Dossche wrote:
> I believe they should be synced indeed, although we should be careful
> with extensions that are dropped from PHP (e.g. imap). Those entries
> should remain only in 8.2 and 8.3 but not in master.
Oh, right! My idea was to handle this
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, 16:32 Ilija Tovilo, wrote:
> Hi Christoph
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:09 PM Christoph M. Becker
> wrote:
> >
> > So I suggest to sync CODEOWNERS for all active branches (and maybe even
> > security branches).
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I think back when it was
Hi Christoph
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:09 PM Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
> So I suggest to sync CODEOWNERS for all active branches (and maybe even
> security branches).
>
> What do you think?
I think back when it was introduced it wasn't clear (at least to me)
that PRs would request reviews
On 18/07/2024 14:08, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have noticed that the CODEOWNERS of php-src are apparently not synced
> for all active branches[1][2]. However, it seems to me that this
> doesn't make sense; if someone provides a PR against some lower branch,
> the most recent
Hi Christoph,
> Hi all!
>
> I have noticed that the CODEOWNERS of php-src are apparently not synced
> for all active branches[1][2]. However, it seems to me that this
> doesn't make sense; if someone provides a PR against some lower branch,
> the most recent CODEOWNERS may not be notified, and
Hi all!
I have noticed that the CODEOWNERS of php-src are apparently not synced
for all active branches[1][2]. However, it seems to me that this
doesn't make sense; if someone provides a PR against some lower branch,
the most recent CODEOWNERS may not be notified, and modifications might
be send
