On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, jpauli wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2012 4:31 AM, "Kris Craig" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Amaury Bouchard
> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object
> > > construction.
> > > Take a look at: https://github.
On Sep 19, 2012 4:31 AM, "Kris Craig" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Amaury Bouchard
wrote:
>
> > Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object
> > construction.
> > Take a look at: https://github.com/AOP-PHP/AOP
> >
> >
> Yeah I wasn't aware of this, either, but I
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Amaury Bouchard wrote:
> Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object
> construction.
> Take a look at: https://github.com/AOP-PHP/AOP
>
>
Yeah I wasn't aware of this, either, but I can think of several scenarios
in which it'd be useful. I kn
Good point - I agree. Thanks for taking the time to think about this!
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:22 PM, jpauli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Amaury Bouchard
> wrote:
> > Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object
> construction.
> > Take a look at: https://gith
This is one of the main use cases of AOP. Demonstrated by this script:
setArguments(array(new Bar));
}
aop_add_before('Foo->__construct()', 'doDi');
$f = new Foo; // 'instance of Bar'
-ralph
On 9/18/12 11:22 AM, jpauli wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Amaury Bouchar
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Amaury Bouchard wrote:
> Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object construction.
> Take a look at: https://github.com/AOP-PHP/AOP
+1, this is the same case as AOP, but for constructor.
Thus AOP may fit the need.
Julien.P
--
PHP Internals
Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object construction.
Take a look at: https://github.com/AOP-PHP/AOP
2012/9/18 Rasmus Schultz :
> Hey,
>
> I'm going to make this brief, because I suspect a lot of people are going
> to jump at the opportunity to cry bloody murder when I su
Hello Rasmus!
~~~
RS> Hey,
RS> I wonder if it would make sense to have a way to globally hook into
RS> __construct() - sort of like how you can hook into the autoloaders with
RS> spl_autoload_register() ...
RS> This could be useful for things like dependen
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Kris Craig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Johannes Schlüter
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08:19 -0400, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I'm going to make this brief, because I suspect a lot of people are
> going
> > > to jump at the o
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08:19 -0400, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'm going to make this brief, because I suspect a lot of people are going
> > to jump at the opportunity to cry bloody murder when I suggest this.
>
HELP! BLOODY
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08:19 -0400, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm going to make this brief, because I suspect a lot of people are going
> to jump at the opportunity to cry bloody murder when I suggest this.
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to have a way to globally hook into
> __construc
Hey,
I'm going to make this brief, because I suspect a lot of people are going
to jump at the opportunity to cry bloody murder when I suggest this.
I wonder if it would make sense to have a way to globally hook into
__construct() - sort of like how you can hook into the autoloaders with
spl_autol
12 matches
Mail list logo
