On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> > I don't know sqlite or IBM, but the MySQL SELECT INTO OUTFILE is a plain
>> > SQL
>> > statement, you don't need any special pdo function to use it, on the
>> > other
>> > hand, you can't use the postgresql's COPY TO/FROM with PDO without
>
> > I don't know sqlite or IBM, but the MySQL SELECT INTO OUTFILE is a plain
> SQL
> > statement, you don't need any special pdo function to use it, on the
> other
> > hand, you can't use the postgresql's COPY TO/FROM with PDO without the
> patch
> > above.
> > Did I misunderstood something?
>
>
On 14.06.2010, at 11:28, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> quoting Denis:
>
> "Actually all the methods are wrappers against the native PostgreSQL
> commands (connection status, copy to/from).
>
> I needed to develop them as methods because it is not possible to get the
> same results with a sql statement
gt; >> To: Ilia Alshanetsky
> >> Cc: Pierre Joye; Denis Gasparin; Matteo Beccati;
> >> internals@lists.php.net; pdo
> >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] New
> >> PDO methods for PostgreSQL driver
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 12,
Stanley Sufficool wrote:
If the dblib methods can't behave the same as the postgres methods,
> then clearly they shouldn't be named the same.
Yes, DBLIB behaves the same as pgsql in that it performs the copy in a
transaction state and also has it's data visible from the server
perspective. So
t;> To: Ilia Alshanetsky
>>> Cc: Pierre Joye; Denis Gasparin; Matteo Beccati;
>>> internals@lists.php.net; pdo
>>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] New
>>> PDO methods for PostgreSQL driver
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4
nternals@lists.php.net; pdo
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] New
>> PDO methods for PostgreSQL driver
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky
>> wrote:
>> > The concerns you raised about custom methods specific to dat
> -Original Message-
> From: Stanley Sufficool [mailto:ssuffic...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 June 2010 20:10
> To: Ilia Alshanetsky
> Cc: Pierre Joye; Denis Gasparin; Matteo Beccati;
> internals@lists.php.net; pdo
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATC
On 13.06.2010, at 21:09, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>> The concerns you raised about custom methods specific to database drivers
>> were not reflective of the PDO's intent as was clarified by Wez and myself.
yeah .. Wez became the ruler o
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> The concerns you raised about custom methods specific to database drivers
> were not reflective of the PDO's intent as was clarified by Wez and myself.
>
> The code that was introduced was specific to PostgreSQL, the common
> functionality
On 12.06.2010, at 15:54, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> The concerns you raised about custom methods specific to database drivers
> were not reflective of the PDO's intent as was clarified by Wez and myself.
>
> The code that was introduced was specific to PostgreSQL, the common
> functionality was in
As far as I can see as a user PDO is quite dead and it's missing much
of new database functionality. Just compare it to mysqli and other
vendor specific extensions witch are developed all the time.
Until there is no dedicated work for all PDO supported databases
there is no point in adding feature
12 matches
Mail list logo
