Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-29 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Marcus Boerger wrote: > to be honest, what is wrong with svn for you? Do you branch off your own > PHP? No, so what's wrong? To easy to use for 99.99% of people using PHP > repository? But please (everyone) just think of it and don't comment > anymore. As I said previously, my personal opinion h

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-28 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Edward, to be honest, what is wrong with svn for you? Do you branch off your own PHP? No, so what's wrong? To easy to use for 99.99% of people using PHP repository? But please (everyone) just think of it and don't comment anymore. The decision has been made we are going for SVN and nothin

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-28 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Travis Swicegood wrote: > On a slightly related note, would anyone else be interested in seeing a > Git repository along side Subversion? Even if people can't commit to > the Git repo, I'd be happy to help set it up with the ability for them > to push changes back to the SVN repo once they've prep

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-25 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 20:25 -0400, Gwynne Raskind wrote: > > Yes, I read that. But the conversion of the repository itself is > > only half the battle. There are a bunch of scripts in CVSROOT that > > need to be ported over to SVN somehow. > > My plan was to work on those next. not only CVS

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-25 Thread David Soria Parra
On a slightly related note, would anyone else be interested in seeing a Git repository along side Subversion? Even if people can't commit to the Git repo, I'd be happy to help set it up with the ability for them to push changes back to the SVN repo once they've prepared their patches. Yes, I'

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Gwynne Raskind
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Sean Coates wrote: Do we have a preference of Apache's SVN or svnserve? The former requires Apache 2+, AFAIK. I'd like to kick this discussion over to the svn-migration@ list; there are a lot of points to consider in this question and internals@ has enough thre

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Sean Coates
Do we have a preference of Apache's SVN or svnserve? The former requires Apache 2+, AFAIK. S -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Travis Swicegood
If it's not happening in the next month, I'd be happy to help. I did the SimpleTest CVS to SVN conversion in about 5 minutes (including waiting on the history to be converted). I've also worked with the hook scripts and such in SVN so I might be able to help out there if someone else doesn't

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Daniel Brown
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd love to see this conversion. Let's make sure we get enough folks to > volunteer to check the history of our source trees although we should in > any case keep the CVS one around for browsing "just in case"... Is thi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Lucas Nealan
I've done a bunch of stuff with svn commit hooks and am willing to lend a hand. -lucas (mobile) On Jul 24, 2008, at 17:06, "Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the point where it might actually have some benefit to

RE: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
I'd love to see this conversion. Let's make sure we get enough folks to volunteer to check the history of our source trees although we should in any case keep the CVS one around for browsing "just in case"... Andi > -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sen

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Gwynne Raskind
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and all the post-commit and ACL

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Gwynne Raskind wrote: On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and all the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Scott MacVicar
I spoke to helly about this just there. I'm more than willing to help. We converted a test repository while developing the re2c stuff. Scott On 25 Jul 2008, at 01:05, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the point where it might actually

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Daniel Brown
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the > point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some > volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and al

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

2008-07-24 Thread Gwynne Raskind
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and all the post-commit and