Hello Joerg Roedel,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch 9648cbc9625b: "iommu/arm-smmu: Make use of the
iommu_register interface" from Feb 1, 2017, leads to the following
Smatch complaint:
./drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c:1957 arm_smmu_remove_device()
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:26:48AM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The pointer isn't cleared because the whole fwspec is freed on the very
> next line.
You are right, stupid me :/ Sorry for the noise.
Joerg
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.lin
On 22/02/17 11:00, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> thanks for the report! There are more bogus things going on here.
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:36:48AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> The patch 9648cbc9625b: "iommu/arm-smmu: Make use of the
>> iommu_register interface" from Feb 1, 2017, lea
Hi Dan,
thanks for the report! There are more bogus things going on here.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:36:48AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The patch 9648cbc9625b: "iommu/arm-smmu: Make use of the
> iommu_register interface" from Feb 1, 2017, leads to the following
> Smatch complaint:
>
> drive
Hello Joerg Roedel,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch 9648cbc9625b: "iommu/arm-smmu: Make use of the
iommu_register interface" from Feb 1, 2017, leads to the following
Smatch complaint:
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c:1810 arm_smmu_remove_device()
