On Jan 12, 2018 3:23 PM, "Mats Wichmann" wrote:
On 01/12/2018 12:54 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> Looking for more info on this. Anybody have a use case or two? Sample
code?
>
> For example, in a household. Clients with admin role can turn things on or
> off. Mom and Pop might use multiple devices
On 01/12/2018 12:54 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> Looking for more info on this. Anybody have a use case or two? Sample code?
>
> For example, in a household. Clients with admin role can turn things on or
> off. Mom and Pop might use multiple devices to control the network. Kids
> cannot. Ok. Why u
On 01/12/2018 01:46 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2018 2:24 PM, "Thiago Macieira"
> wrote:
>
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 09:24:28 PST Filipe de Melo Silva wrote:
>> So, are you saying that is impossible to reproduce this situation?
> Suppose
>> that we have a resource that can be discov
On Jan 12, 2018 2:24 PM, "Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
On Friday, 12 January 2018 09:24:28 PST Filipe de Melo Silva wrote:
> So, are you saying that is impossible to reproduce this situation?
Suppose
> that we have a resource that can be discovered ONLY by a certain kind of
> users (ex.: Administrator
On 01/12/2018 12:15 PM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> My view, as API maintainer...
>
> Mats writes:
>> Question 1. How *do* you determine the official API list? Is it purely
>> determined by the list of headers? Which is the correct list of headers?
>
> Yes, the correct list is the set of .h files co
On Friday, 12 January 2018 09:24:28 PST Filipe de Melo Silva wrote:
> So, are you saying that is impossible to reproduce this situation? Suppose
> that we have a resource that can be discovered ONLY by a certain kind of
> users (ex.: Administrators), does IoTivity support it?
I'm not sure that's
Looking for more info on this. Anybody have a use case or two? Sample code?
For example, in a household. Clients with admin role can turn things on or
off. Mom and Pop might use multiple devices to control the network. Kids
cannot. Ok. Why use roles instead of just authenticating each device? If
Inline [geo]
-Original Message-
From: iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org
[mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Mats Wichmann
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 10:19 AM
To: IoTivity Developer List
Subject: [dev] a few more API questions (doc, mainly). long-ish.
On Jan 12, 2018 12:18 PM, "Mats Wichmann" wrote:
...
we need to do a better job of categorizing/grouping, because it
is hard to sort out from the website docs.
Suggestion: the first order of business should be code refactoring and
reorganization. App devs need the docs for the API, but those
On Jan 12, 2018 12:18 PM, "Mats Wichmann" wrote:
...
in the build scripts, RD_MODE is always
either CLIENT or SERVER,
I somehow got the impression that the RD stuff was dead and should be
removed. No?
G
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@l
My view, as API maintainer...
Mats writes:
> Question 1. How *do* you determine the official API list? Is it purely
> determined by the list of headers? Which is the correct list of headers?
Yes, the correct list is the set of .h files copied to the out/ directory by
the build.
> Is there a
After a bit of investigation, it appears the C++ documentation may not have
been posted on the https://api-docs.iotivity.org site. There is C API
doxygen-generated material at https://api-docs.iotivity.org/latest-c/ and Java
API material at https://api-docs.iotivity.org/latest-java/ but nothing
Question 1. How *do* you determine the official API list? Is it purely
determined by the list of headers? Which is the correct list of
headers? For example, doxygen has a list of headers, sometimes called
out by name like:
INPUT = . \
../../csdk/include/octypes.h \
On Jan 12, 2018 11:24 AM, "Filipe de Melo Silva" wrote:
So, are you saying that is impossible to reproduce this situation? Suppose
that we have a resource that can be discovered ONLY by a certain kind of
users (ex.: Administrators), does IoTivity support it?
See chapter 6 of the security spec.
The link on the documentation page https://www.iotivity.org/documentation
points here for the C++ API:
https://api-docs.iotivity.org/latest/index.html
but that just picks up the C API again, it shows the exact same thing
that the link for the C API does.
Can this be fixed to point to the right
So, are you saying that is impossible to reproduce this situation? Suppose
that we have a resource that can be discovered ONLY by a certain kind of
users (ex.: Administrators), does IoTivity support it?
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 07:25:
On 01/11/2018 10:32 AM, LaBrecque, Margaret wrote:
> We are seeking volunteers to help improve the IoTivity website documentation.
> If I haven’t made a formal invitation to this list, consider it done now. We
> don’t have a plan yet but for sure, we want to clean up the IoTivity wiki --
> so v
Hi everyone,
I'm adding my superior to this thread so he can join the discussion. I'm
not asking any questions for now but the interest on documentation remains.
Regards,
Lapprand
Em qui, 11 de jan de 2018 às 14:35, LaBrecque, Margaret <
margaret.labrec...@intel.com> escreveu:
> Hi Gregg and Io
On Friday, 12 January 2018 07:25:13 PST Filipe de Melo Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe you guys can help me with something. I have 2 resources (A and B) and
> 2 devices (X and Y). I want to allow X to discover A and NOT B. The
> opposite to Y (be able to discover B and NOT A). Can it be done? If so,
Hi,
Maybe you guys can help me with something. I have 2 resources (A and B) and
2 devices (X and Y). I want to allow X to discover A and NOT B. The
opposite to Y (be able to discover B and NOT A). Can it be done? If so,
how? Can I do this kind of discover access control by the Access Control
List
20 matches
Mail list logo
