Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-05 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Dec 5, 2017 12:00 PM, "Mats Wichmann" wrote: On 12/05/2017 10:48 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 08:47:44 PST Mats Wichmann wrote: >> I can say from my time working on OCF certification that the intent was >> always for app cert to be possible. I was never sure if ther

Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-05 Thread Mats Wichmann
On 12/05/2017 10:48 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 08:47:44 PST Mats Wichmann wrote: >> I can say from my time working on OCF certification that the intent was >> always for app cert to be possible. I was never sure if there would be a >> lot of market for it (won't speak

Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 08:47:44 PST Mats Wichmann wrote: > I can say from my time working on OCF certification that the intent was > always for app cert to be possible. I was never sure if there would be a > lot of market for it (won't speak for anyone else on that, just my > opinion). If I'm

Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-05 Thread Mats Wichmann
On 12/04/2017 11:45 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 4 December 2017 19:10:53 PST Gregg Reynolds wrote: >> Sorry about previous message. New phone >> >> Anyway, hmmm. If that is the case what is the point of certification? >> Nobody asks a web server for that kind of certification, it all ju

Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 4 December 2017 19:10:53 PST Gregg Reynolds wrote: > Sorry about previous message. New phone > > Anyway, hmmm. If that is the case what is the point of certification? > Nobody asks a web server for that kind of certification, it all just works. > Is there anything to certification beyon

Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-04 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Dec 4, 2017 8:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: On Monday, 4 December 2017 18:33:44 PST Gregg Reynolds wrote: > Was just looking at the cert page on the OCF website. That text strongly > implies that only devices can be certified. If that is the case then how > can a generic OCF "engine" like I

Re: [dev] Certification

2017-12-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 4 December 2017 18:33:44 PST Gregg Reynolds wrote: > Was just looking at the cert page on the OCF website. That text strongly > implies that only devices can be certified. If that is the case then how > can a generic OCF "engine" like Iotivity (or OpenOCF) be certified? It cannot. You

[dev] Certification

2017-12-04 Thread Gregg Reynolds
Was just looking at the cert page on the OCF website. That text strongly implies that only devices can be certified. If that is the case then how can a generic OCF "engine" like Iotivity (or OpenOCF) be certified? g ___ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivit

[dev] Certification Test Tool

2016-09-29 Thread Dwarkaprasad Dayama
OSWG - Spec Coordination TG Chair Iotivity Steering Group - Advisory Committee From: iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Ferguson, Daniel J Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 6:03 AM To: iotivity-dev Subject: [dev] Certifica

[dev] Certification Test Tool

2016-09-28 Thread Ferguson, Daniel J
Hi All, Does the CTT support IPv6? Thanks, ~Daniel -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: