>
> Hi,
>
> The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */"
> The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
[Liebig, Holger]
I would say no, but who knows for sure without Intel documentation about the
OEM SDR's in this particular quite old system from
I am not sure where is the misinterpretation on this thread.
Could it be the one incorrect word translation when asking
for the membership combined with the first post on this thread?
The sf hides emails. So sending to the sf mail unless I can
see the non-sf email as recognized by active develope
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */"
> The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
>
Hello,
yes, it seems like it(= it is not a bug). One line of comment wouldn't
hurt, I'd say(I
Hi,
The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */"
The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windo
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
[...]
>> > Then it's about effort to generate the report,
>> > effort to check the reported item
>> > whether it's security issue or not and effort to fix it. These are
>> > not the same thing.
>>
>> Right. And if you want to do it all behind t
- Original Message -
> From: "Zdenek Styblik"
> To: "Ales Ledvinka"
> Cc: "ipmitool-devel"
> Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 1:23:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] code analysis
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Ales Ledvinka
> wrote:
> [...]
> > Per issue, file or defect type gr
