I think I may have been misunderstood. Let me see if the response clears it
up?
>The discussion below raises concerns with our proposed draft for
>an SCTP sockets API. SCTP is a reliable datagram transport developed
>by SIGTRAN to carry telephony signaling information.
>One distinctive feature
Dear All:
One note to all you readers.. this draft is a very very early
first cut. We rushed it out to get it in to the drafts editor
and thus it requires quite a bit of work yet :->
I did not get Jim's original email so I have a hard time
reading the snippet below and making sense of it...
I
The discussion below raises concerns with our proposed draft for
an SCTP sockets API. SCTP is a reliable datagram transport developed
by SIGTRAN to carry telephony signaling information.
One distinctive feature of SCTP is direct support for multi-homed
hosts. SCTP has the notion of a "primary a
Attached is the proposed agenda for the IPng w.g. sessions at the
Pittsburgh IETF. The IPng working group will have two sessions. There
will also be a joint IPng / Mobile IP session on Tuesday. The agenda for
that session will be sent out separately.
Please send us changes, additions, and c
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:46:37 -0400,
> > "Brian Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Yes, it is equivalent to the "local scope" defined in
> > RFC 2365 and RFC 2730. It should be noted that those documents
> > refer to IPv6 scope 3
Mauro,
>> but v4 mapped does not affect the ISV porting effort at all and in fact
>> makes their job much easier if the platform they are porting to supports
>> that paradigm.
>you are absolutely right. my concern was about api issues. a modification
>in the behaviour of af_inet6 passive socket,
I think most of the items are replied in reply to Brian.
>> there's no way for the current API to recognize IPv4 traffic on top
>> of AF_INET6 socket (appears as IPv4 mapped address), and native
>> IPv6 traffic with IPv4 mapped address in the header). at least
>> we
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration in IPv6
Author(s) : T. Nar
