The EUI-64 ID is just one way to build the 64-bit interface ID, and is the
way specified for auto-address configuration. The 64-bits may also be manually
configured - simple numbers that might be easier to organize than a seemingly
random number, or even intentionally random numbers that change p
The Inform message is defined in the -21 rev of the DHCPv6 spec, which was
submitted before the publication deadline last week but has not yet been
published at www.ietf.org. You can get a copy from www.dhcp.org now...
- Ralph
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> a comment on d
a comment on draft-droms-dnsconfig-dhcpv6-00.txt.
quoting section 3:
> 1. Multicast a DHCPv6 Inform message to a well-known multicast
> address requesting DNS configuration information, including:
> * IPv6 addresses of DNS server(s)
> * Domain name
>
The draft agenda is attached. When we put together the agenda we give
priority to current working group activities and documents, new individual
submissions, and last to status reports.
Please send us comments, corrections, additions, and deletions.
Thanks,
Bob Hinden & Steve Deering
---
Dear IPNGWG Members!
My name is Daniel Nemeth, and I'm a student at Budapest University of
Technology and Economics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Informatics. The subject of my Project Laboratory is examination of IP
micromobility protocols. At the moment I've got some questions related
Hello all,
I've read already a couple of RFCs and books to familiarize myself with IPv6.
I'm struggling with the following: Neighbor discovery is used to find out the
corresponding
Layer-2 address to a given IPv6 unicast address ( similar to the ARP process in IPv4).
On the other hand I have lea
Hello,
recently I was very surprised, when I found that there is an existing
ip6.arpa. domain, where the reverse IPv6 nibble format is delegated to
the registries.
I found no mail or announcement anywhere that from now on ip6.arpa should be
used for the reverse nibble format. Is that a fact
HI Guys,
If The DA of the packet is site local i would not forward the packet
outside the scope.But if the SA of the packet is site local and the DA is
global,would i forward the packet outside the site?
Thanks in Advance,
Krishna
-
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial
C@t-32-BitOID:UnirVerse0GGGWWWX32-Bit Managed Address
Jim Fleming
http://www.ddj.com/articles/search/search.cgi?q=fleming
Oct93: The C+@ Programming Language
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Hinden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
Just a comment, not about the document itself. At the last ETSI
IPv6 plugtest I did some tests about anycast support:
- source routing with a subnet anycast (something like please
go through this routing domain / sub-network)
- source routing with multiple anycasts (the same one)
- ping to a
Merav Haran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need your help with the following questions for host IPv6 support:
>
> 1.Does IPv6 fragmentation occur in TCP/IP applications? Since the
> sending host should know the path MTU and there is no fragmentation by
> intermediate routers, is there a reason for th
Erik, Thomas,
The chairs of the IP Next Generation working group, on behalf of the
working group, request that the following document be published as an Draft
Standard:
Title : IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
Author(s) : B. Hinden, S. Deering
Filena
Hi,
I need your help with the following questions for host IPv6 support:
1. Does IPv6 fragmentation occur in TCP/IP applications? Since the
sending host should know the path MTU and there is no fragmentation by
intermediate routers, is there a reason for the TCP to send bigger segments
than
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:34:04AM -0800, Steve Deering wrote:
> At 10:08 AM +0530 11/28/01, Jagan wrote:
> >The Hop limit in IPv6 hdr is decrimented by every intermediate node in
> >the journey of the packet. Does it mean the packet can only tranverse
> >through 256 intermediate nodes ( 2^8 )?
>
Hi All,
We have submitted an update to the "Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a
Cellular Host" draft on Tuesday November 20th. It looks like it has not yet
been announced. In the meantime, the draft can be found here:
http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/draft-manyfolks-ipv6-cellular-host-02.txt
The aut
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6
Author(s) : R. Gilligan, S. Thomson, J. Bound, W. Stevens
Fil
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
Author(s) : B. Hinden, S. Deering
Filename: draft-ietf-ipng
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IPv6 Stateless DNS Discovery
Author(s) : D. Thaler, J. Hagino
Filename: draft-ietf-ipngwg-dns-di
Unless someone has an iptables module that mangles the TTL count
in a "non-standard" manner...
This may help...
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
- O
At 10:08 AM +0530 11/28/01, Jagan wrote:
>The Hop limit in IPv6 hdr is decrimented by every intermediate node in
>the journey of the packet. Does it mean the packet can only tranverse
>through 256 intermediate nodes ( 2^8 )?
Yes, it is limited to 255 IP hops (where a single IP hop may span
multip
Quoting Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
>There is presently now trouble with wlan cards and multicast from
> Lucent and
> ^^^
>
> => I believe you mean "no" ?
>
Yes, thanks for the correction.
Martin
---
21 matches
Mail list logo
