On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > % What we need is netgear and linksys to get on board and some of us
> in
> > % deployment land are bugging folks like that now.
> >
> > Jim,
> > what is the issue here? I have both linksys and netgear
> > kit in the home network and both
Pekka Savola wrote:
> I don't know about the rest of the world, but here in Finland it's
> relatively common to build DSL networks using bridged ATM
> encapsulation,
> rather than routed ATM encapsulation, or PPPoE (PPPoA is
> another issue).
> (From IPv4 perspective, this has the benefit that
Hi,
Can I get more information IPV6 FIB?
Other than 3 fibs (link,site,global) do we need to have anything
for multicast .
More information about IPV6 Fib design document/information
Will be help full.
Thanks,
Keshava
--
Hi Keshava,
At 09:24 PM 12/22/2002 +0800, Keshava Ayanur wrote:
Hi,
Can I get more information IPV6 FIB?
Other than 3 fibs (link,site,global) do we need to have anything
for multicast .
There is no need to have a link-local FIB, as packets to/from link-local
addresses a
hi john,
what do u meant say? Multihomed host is beyond this document?
is Running the routing protocol or necessary configuration not a minimum
requirement of multihomed host?
One more Question regarding IPv6 mib ?
RFCs and the Draft are follow contractible apporaches.
Hi all,
I have a doubt regarding FIB implementation.
We are using one alogorithm which is consuming too much memory
for memtainace of routing tabel. Is there any efficient
algorithm
fast(look up) and takes less memory for storing Ipv6 routes.
regards
ari.
