Hi Ari,
The IETF does not, typically, specify algorithms.
There has been quite a bit of research done in efficient
FIB storage algorithms in other fora, such as the ACM,
though. Last time I looked into this topic (a couple
of years ago), trie-based algorithms were very popular,
and the Luleå
Hi Minto,
what do u meant say? Multihomed host is beyond this document?
What I mean is that it is not a requirement that an IPv6 Node
be multihomed.
is Running the routing protocol or necessary configuration
not a minimum requirement of multihomed host?
A multihomed host is not
Hi Margaret,
Hi Hiroki,
Please let me verify two things on draft-wasserman-ipv6-sl-impact-00.txt.
1. Does [The Impact of Site-Local Addressing in IPv6] try to
prohibit the use of SBR completely?
If the WG chooses to follow the recommendations in this document,
then SBRs will not longer be
Hi Hiroki,
Yes, our SBR routers have been shipped since September, 2000 as
a commercial IPv4/IPv6 dual router. It supports RIPng, OSPFv3, and
BGP4+. I have explained our SBR support and routing protocols in this
mailing list once before when the site-local issues were brought up.
I do
Hi Margaret,
For OSPFv3, as you described in I-D, we are allocating separate OSPF
process for each area. The current OSPFv3 does not consider SBR at all.
This is the reason for separating OSPF processes.
Do these processes share a single global routing table, based on
the link-state
