Hi!
I think my question is best answered in this mailing list. When I read
books about IPv6, they mention always an 48bit prefix for SL addresses,
but reading the archives of this list, the people discuss about a 10bit
prefix. Is FEC0::/10 valid now, or still a draft or subject to change
and FEC0:
Hi Mario,
The new addressing architecture has been approved for publication
as a Draft Standard, and should be published shortly. So, the
FECO::/10 is official.
Margaret
At 01:58 PM 1/16/2003 +0100, Mario Goebbels wrote:
Hi!
I think my question is best answered in this mailing list. When I
This is a IPv6 working group last call for comments on advancing the
following document as an Informational RFC:
Title : A Flexible Method for Managing the Assignment of
Bits of an IPv6 Address Block
Author(s) : M. Blanchet
Filename : draft-ietf-ipv6-ipaddressassign-0
This is a IPv6 working group last call for comments on advancing the
following document as a Proposed Standard:
Title : IP Forwarding Table MIB
Author(s) : M. Wasserman
Filename : draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-02.txt
Pages : 30
Date : 2002-11-7
Please send substantive comments to the ip
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Bob Hinden wrote:
> This is a IPv6 working group last call for comments on advancing the
> following document as a Proposed Standard:
"Advancing as a Proposed Standard"? I assume you didn't mean DS because
I'm not sure how widely that is implemented yet, but rather "publish
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> This is a IPv6 working group last call for comments on advancing the
> following document as an Informational RFC:
>
> Title : A Flexible Method for Managing the Assignment of
> Bits of an IPv6
