Hi
I am developing a Web server , router , load balancers, Gateway and Switch
testing software.
I have read the RFC reagrding the addressing in IPv6 and I understood that
Web servers , routers , load balancers, Gateways and Switches can have
either Unicast or Multicast or Anycast address.
I am
Draft 11 of the Addressing Architecture says the following:
a. The prefix length of link-local is 10 bits i.e., FE80::/10 (sec 2.4)
b. For all unicast addresses, except those that start with binary value
000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long and to be constructed in
Modified EUI-64
Hi all,
DNS Discovery Design Team studied the opportunity to use RA so as to
advertise DNS resolver IPv6 addresses in 2001. But no proposition has
followed. The only propositions today are to use well-known addresses or
DHCPv6.
I believe that such a solution may be still interesting.
I've propo
> So how about this:
> "The 20-bit Flow Label field in the IPv6 header [IPv6] is used by a
> source to label packets of a flow. Packet classifiers use the triplet
> of Flow Label, Source Address, and Destination Address fields to
> identify which flow a particular packet belongs to. Packets are
In your previous mail you wrote:
> => I disagree: without authentication (by a pre-shared
> secret, certificate/signature or public key) you can be
> attacked by the Man-In-The-Middle, i.e., you can get a very
> secure connection with a bad guy, not the intended
> correspondent
> => I disagree: without authentication (by a pre-shared
> secret, certificate/signature or public key) you can be
> attacked by the Man-In-The-Middle, i.e., you can get a very
> secure connection with a bad guy, not the intended
> correspondent. There are some schemes where one participant
>
In your previous mail you wrote:
I want to know if there have been made additions to the IPsec part on
IPv6. Something that bugs me to Ipsec on IPv4 is that it either required
some system backed authentication (Kerberos), some CA issued certificate
or the worst solution being a static
Hi!
I want to know if there have been made additions to the IPsec part on
IPv6. Something that bugs me to Ipsec on IPv4 is that it either required
some system backed authentication (Kerberos), some CA issued certificate
or the worst solution being a static keyphrase. Now to my question: Does
IPsec
