Fwd: Re: dual stack IPv6 on by default

FYI -- A discussion on v6ops that really ought to be happening here, since it concerns the ND RFC. Margaret To: Ronald van der Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Alain Durand [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sebastien Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dual stack IPv6 on by

draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-03.txt

4.5.5 Stateful Address Autoconfiguration Stateful Address Autoconfiguration MAY be supported. DHCP [DHCPv6] is the standard stateful address configuration protocol. See section 5.3 for details on DHCP. The above MAY should be a SHOULD. There is not mention of stateful support from ND M or O

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-03.txt

To further support a SHOULD: In 2119 it states: 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective RECOMMENDED, mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a

Re: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-03.txt

Hi, On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Bound, Jim wrote: 4.5.5 Stateful Address Autoconfiguration Stateful Address Autoconfiguration MAY be supported. DHCP [DHCPv6] is the standard stateful address configuration protocol. See section 5.3 for details on DHCP. The above MAY should be a SHOULD. There is