Does this imply that the 13bit TLA of the initial addressing scheme is
scrapped too?
Thanks for any info.
-mg
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP
Hi!
I want to know if there have been made additions to the IPsec part on
IPv6. Something that bugs me to Ipsec on IPv4 is that it either required
some system backed authentication (Kerberos), some CA issued certificate
or the worst solution being a static keyphrase. Now to my question: Does
= I disagree: without authentication (by a pre-shared
secret, certificate/signature or public key) you can be
attacked by the Man-In-The-Middle, i.e., you can get a very
secure connection with a bad guy, not the intended
correspondent. There are some schemes where one participant
can be
Hi!
I think my question is best answered in this mailing list. When I read
books about IPv6, they mention always an 48bit prefix for SL addresses,
but reading the archives of this list, the people discuss about a 10bit
prefix. Is FEC0::/10 valid now, or still a draft or subject to change
and
