Han wrote:
I agree with Richard.
The AP cahed RAs can be esaily implemented and an alternative to fast RAs.
IMHO, The AP which cache RAs and sends them to an MN at its association with the AP,
is more deployable approach than router supporting fast RA.
The change of AP is easier than the
James Kempf worte:
The problem with this proposal is that the AP doesn't exist as far as IETF is
concerned. An AP is not an IP device, and it is not on the map as far as the
Internet architecture is concerned.. Routers do exist and therefore the fast RA
could be standardized in the IETF.
Dear IPv6 WG:The followingdraft is
postednewlyin the drafts
directoryhttp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lee-optimal-detect-pmtu-00.txt
Title : Optimal Detecting Increases in PMTU
Author(s) : HAK GOO LEE,PYUNG SOO
KIM,YOUNG KEUN KIM,CHU KYO SHIN
Abstract : This document presents
