Han wrote: > I agree with Richard. > The AP cahed RAs can be esaily implemented and an alternative to fast RAs. > IMHO, The AP which cache RAs and sends them to an MN at its association with the AP, > is more deployable approach than router supporting fast RA. > The change of AP is easier than the change of router. >
As i know, APs are acting as link-layer relays, which means that they transport Ethernet-layer frames between the wireless medium and the subnet. In other words, APs don't provide the IP functionality. Do you mean that APs should provide the IPv6 functionality to "cache RAs"? Rgds, -pyungsoo -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
