Re: Let's abolish scope

2003-08-14 Thread george+ipng
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:58:22 +0200 > From: Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: IBM > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) > X-Accept-Language: en,fr,de > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Let's abolish scope [Re: Unicast scope field (was: Moving

Site Local == Network Address Translation?

2003-04-04 Thread george+ipng
Eliot Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since we have established that site-locals will encourage the use of NATs > ('cause that's how it's done today) Certainly a lot of people have tried to advance this proposition, but it seems dubious to me. Site local addresses will neither encourage nor di

Re: CONSENSUS CALL: Deprecating Site-Local Addressing

2003-04-01 Thread george+ipng
NO -- Do not deprecate site-local unicast addressing. Site-locals are useful for disconnected sites, and for nodes on connected sites which should never have global connectivity. The cost: Addresses may be ambiguous in certain cases. Applications will have to choose between addresses when a int

Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...)

2002-12-02 Thread george+ipng
> From: David Borman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > IPv4 has globally routable GUPI (GRUPI) addresses. That's all it had > in the early days. The explosion in the size of the routing tables is > was forced changes such as CIDR and new addresses being allocated from > ISP blocks. The only reason we sti

Recent Posting Stats

2002-11-01 Thread george+ipng
Over the past 8 days, I've received 526 postings on this list from 54 individuals, including this many from people posting 10 or more messages: 10 From: Rob Austein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11 From: Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 13 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15 From: "Richard Draves" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [mobile-ip] Re: HAO and BE processing will be mandated

2002-07-23 Thread george+ipng
I've been using KAME code since August 1999 when I patched FreeBSD 3.4 to support IPv6. I think the community owes a great debt to all the KAME developers, without whose work we probably wouldn't have as great an installed BSD IPv6 base as we do. So I mean no disrespect to the KAME developers wh

ICANN Considered Harmful

2002-04-01 Thread george+ipng
So many questions and so few answers. My modest proposal: http://www.f-iw.org/. Subject: George for Benevolent Internet Dictator My platform: "You could do worse." IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page:

Flow Label

2002-01-03 Thread george+ipng
Just a quick question from an interested lurker: Are these hums of acquiescence in response, specifically, to the idea that an originating node may set the flow label to any value, and that nodes forwarding packets will leave that value alone? -- George Mitchell -

Thanks for all the great software!

2000-07-30 Thread george+ipng
Thanks to everybody on this list who designed, wrote, and tested IP version 6 software! Now that the 6bone has recovered from its spasm of routing misinformation, I'm pleased to announce that the World Science Fiction Society's web page is now accessible via IPv6 at www6.wsfs.org or www6.worldcon