PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Margaret Wasserman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alain Durand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John Beck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 August 2003 01:38
Subject: Moving the ipng mailing list
snip
One small point. The list is currently named ipng. We could keep
the
name the same or change it to ipv6
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 17:24:00 -0700, Bob Hinden Margaret Wasserman wrote:
The current plan is to move the list to ietf.org.
Can the list be moved to a server that supports IPv6 transport? E.g.,
it looks like all the ops.ietf.org lists are delivered over IPv6 now.
rvdp
Ronald van der Pol wrote:
Can the list be moved to a server that supports IPv6 transport? E.g.,
it looks like all the ops.ietf.org lists are delivered over IPv6 now.
Are those the words of a volunteer?
Eliot
IETF IPng Working
IPv6 IPng. While IPv6 is still considered a new-generation protocol,
it'd be better to use the official name (i.e. the one by which 571531857
people know it).
Eugene
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:
IPv6. However, I think it would be even better to get ietf.org to add
IPv6 support so all IETF content and lists will be accessible with
IPv6.
I periodically ask the IETF chair about this. I suggest that anyone
who thinks it is important for ietf.org to support IPv6 to send mail
to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith Moore wrote:
SNIP
I think it's not terribly important. The principal value would be for
show, not for utility. And IMHO it sends a misleading message.
SNIP
Of course I have no objection to anyone, including ietf.org,
using IPv6 for SMTP or HTTP.
But mommy, if the geeks don't use it, they probably don't
want to rely on it either, so why should I ?
I rely on IPv6 every single day, and I think I qualify as a geek. That
doesn't mean I think it's a good idea to fragment the IPv4-based email
or web infrastructures.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But mommy, if the geeks don't use it, they probably don't
want to rely on it either, so why should I ?
I rely on IPv6 every single day, and I think I qualify as a
geek. That doesn't mean I think it's a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But mommy, if the geeks don't use it, they probably don't
want to rely on it either, so why should I ?
I rely on IPv6 every single day, and I think I qualify as a
geek. That doesn't mean I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith Moore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But mommy, if the geeks don't use it, they probably don't
want to rely on it either, so why should I ?
I rely on IPv6 every single day,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 13:45:10 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
I periodically ask the IETF chair about this. I suggest that anyone
who thinks it is important for ietf.org to support IPv6 to send mail
to the IETF chair.
I think it's not terribly important. The principal value would be for
Good point. I'll forward a copy of those to the chairs.
- Alain.
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 02:54 PM, David Malone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:24:00PM -0700, Bob Hinden Margaret
Wasserman wrote:
After many years of service Sun Microsystems has indicated that they
can no
longer
Folks,
After many years of service Sun Microsystems has indicated that they can no
longer administer the ipng mailing list of the IPv6 working
group. Consequentially, we will be moving the list in next two or three
weeks. Sun will continue to manage the list through the transition.
We first
13 matches
Mail list logo
