Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Dan Lanciani wrote:
|> An obvious reason would be that the one who wishes to subnet
|> the /64 is not the same one who should have used a /48, with
|> the former one having little control over the latter one.
|
|A dial-up connection gets a /48.
It's n
Date:Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:05:39 -0800
From:"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| This is wrong. If the university is in the ISP business, they should
| get a /35 or a /29.
They're not.
| You keep trying to break RFC 2373 to solve pr
kre,
> The question is who otherwise provides the address space? And then
> what address space I provide to those who connect to my house, and
> what address space they provide others who connect to them.
Agree.
> Please do remember that while multiple layers of connectivity today
> might be si
Date:Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:45:08 -0800
From:"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| 1. Your university has a /48.
| 2. Your home gets a /48.
| 3. If your university provides you address space that you use in your
| home setup, that par
kre,
>> Michel Py wrote:
>> Absolutely. If you dial into your company, there is nothing that I
>> know of that says you must get a /64. The allocation of the SLA
>> bits is at the discretion of the company's network administrator,
>> and allocating a /60 to ...
> kre wrote:
> A while ago, you we
Date:Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:51:23 -0800
From:"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Absolutely. If you dial into your company, there is nothing that I
| know of that says you must get a /64. The allocation of the SLA
| bits is at the dis
Pekka, Dale, kre, others,
I consolidated several postings into one
>>> Dan Lanciani wrote:
>>> An obvious reason would be that the one who wishes to subnet
>>> the /64 is not the same one who should have used a /48, with
>>> the former one having little control over the latter one.
>> Michel
]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-00.txt (fwd)
"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[much snipped]
|and I still fail to see a valid reason to subnet
|a /64 when one should have used a /48 and
Date:Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:15:40 -0800
From:"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| A dial-up connection gets a /48.
Always?
Really?
Sure, if you're dialing into an ISP, with a whole bunch of /48's to
issue (as static assignments, or
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Michel Py wrote:
> > What do others think -- is this something worth noting?
>
> Overall, I find the text excellent.
>
> I oppose solutions 2,3 and 4 because they bring extra
> complexity to solve a problem that does not exist. The problem
> that does not exist is the need t
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Michel Py wrote:
> > Dan Lanciani wrote:
> > An obvious reason would be that the one who wishes to subnet
> > the /64 is not the same one who should have used a /48, with
> > the former one having little control over the latter one.
>
> A dial-up connection gets a /48.
N
> Dan Lanciani wrote:
> An obvious reason would be that the one who wishes to subnet
> the /64 is not the same one who should have used a /48, with
> the former one having little control over the latter one.
A dial-up connection gets a /48.
"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[much snipped]
|and I still fail to see a valid reason to subnet
|a /64 when one should have used a /48 and subnet using the SLA
|bits.
An obvious reason would be that the one who wishes to subnet the /64
is not the same one who should have used a /48, wit
Pekka,
> What do others think -- is this something worth noting?
Overall, I find the text excellent.
I oppose solutions 2,3 and 4 because they bring extra
complexity to solve a problem that does not exist. The problem
that does not exist is the need to subnet a /64.
The reason /127 subnets hav
14 matches
Mail list logo
