In the November version of the new RFC2096 draft, the Revision History for
13 Jul 2002 states that the inetcidrRouteNextHopType MIB object was
removed. But the definition of this MIB object still appears in the
November version with a STATUS of current. Is this MIB object still
supported to be
Sorry, I mistyped on or the other of the two revision dates...
The inetCidrRouteNextHopType is needed, because the two IP addresses
may not be the same type. Although they both have to be the same
IP version (v4 or v6), they may have different IPv6 scopes (i.e.
one could be global and one
