A little. Also like GET-VPN and AC-VPN and Provider-1 (apologies to all
the vendors I've missed)
Those are some of the incompatible solutions by individual vendors.
Yoav
On 10/14/11 8:18 AM, "Dan Harkins" wrote:
>
> Sounds like TED:
>
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t5/feature/
Sounds like TED:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t5/feature/guide/ted.html
Dan.
On Thu, October 13, 2011 10:23 pm, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Hi all
>
> For years, one of the barriers to the adoption of IPsec was that
> configuration didn't scale. With thousands of peers, the PAD and S
Hi all
For years, one of the barriers to the adoption of IPsec was that
configuration didn't scale. With thousands of peers, the PAD and SPD would
become unwieldy, so even where IPsec was deployed it was often built in
hub-and-spoke configurations, not because policy demanded this, but
because it
On 9/18/2011 9:41 PM, Cui Yang wrote:
> Dear IPsec experts,
> cc TICTOC WG
>
> May I make a review request for the draft on
> "IPsec security for packet based synchronization"
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-tictoc-ipsec-security-for-synchronization/
>
> Abstract:
> Cellular network
