Re: [IPsec] [TICTOC] Review request for IPsec security for packet based synchronization (Yang Cui)

2011-10-21 Thread Danny Mayer
On 10/20/2011 1:39 AM, Cui Yang wrote: > As I have noted in the last email, timestamping all packets is too costly to afford to. We have done some experiments on our products, the degrading of performance is unacceptable. That is why we need to distinguish 1588 packet from others with high priority

Re: [IPsec] ´ð¸´: [TICTOC] Review request for IPsec security for packet based synchronization (Yang Cui)

2011-10-21 Thread Danny Mayer
On 10/19/2011 10:09 PM, Cui Yang wrote: [...] > 1. Most doubts have been cast on the rationale of encryption. Thanks to comments by Tim and others, this requirement comes from 3GPP spec., as explained in the Introduction, where it says that 3GPP spec. SHALL support encryption/tunnel in backhaul lin