Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN

2011-12-12 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi all If we want Paul and Yaron to take this to our AD, we need to show that there are more people who think these work items are a good idea. More people than just me and MCR. So please show your support (or objections!) soon. An I think this is a good idea, I think we should use ternary

Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN

2011-12-12 Thread Stephen Hanna
Yes, I definitely think this is a good idea. Thanks, Steve -Original Message- From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yoav Nir Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 4:45 AM To: IPsecme WG Cc: Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN Hi all

Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN

2011-12-12 Thread david.black
+1, Thanks, --David -Original Message- From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hanna Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Yoav Nir; IPsecme WG Cc: Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN Yes, I definitely think this is

Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN

2011-12-12 Thread Mark Boltz
+1 from me as well. The approach is a good idea, and the WG should proceed as outlined. Mark On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, david.bl...@emc.com david.bl...@emc.com wrote: +1, Thanks, --David -Original Message- From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf

Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN

2011-12-12 Thread Suresh Melam
+1 thanks, -suresh On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 07:50:06AM -0800, Mark Boltz wrote: +1 from me as well. The approach is a good idea, and the WG should proceed as outlined. Mark On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, david.bl...@emc.com david.bl...@emc.com wrote: +1, Thanks, --David

Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Ko
As I indicated in the side meeting and mailing list discussions, I definitely support this going forward. Mike - Original Message - From: Yoav Nir To: IPsecme WG Cc: Paul Hoffman Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:44 AM Subject: Re: [IPsec] Large Scale VPN Hi all If we want Paul and