Scott C Moonen writes:
I'm curious how IKEv2-only implementations have approached the problem of
dealing with IKEv1 proposals. IKEv2 defines an INVALID_MAJOR_VERSION
notify, but it only carries a maximum version and not a minimum version. (I
wonder if that is an oversight.) IKEv1 (in RFC 2408)
Hi all.
This is the 3rd iteration of the draft I presented about in Paris.
We would like this working group to accept this, and have it added to charter.
Of course, if it gets accepted, we volunteer to be authors. If it is not
accepted, we will try to progress it as an individual submission,
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
We would like this working group to accept this, and have it added to
charter. Of course, if it gets accepted, we volunteer to be authors. If it is
not accepted, we will try to progress it as an individual submission, but we
believe that this
