On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Dan Harkins wrote:
Hi David,
On Wed, October 17, 2012 11:36 am, David Brownhill (dbrownhi) wrote:
Hi Dan,
The lack or EAP authentication would be a non-starter for us to implement
this in our remote access VPN client. Why not support EAP authentication?
Paul Hoffman writes:
Greetings again. We have a 2-hour time slot in Atlanta, which is way
more than we asked for. We don't need to be talking about
draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem because it's finished with WG LC
and is being sent to the AD for review. This is a call for agenda
items.
Dan,
There's not need to ask the IESG about the process to update the
registry in question it's clear: RFC required. You can get an RFC
through a WG, through an AD, or through the ISE.
spt
On 10/15/12 10:54 PM, Dan Harkins wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Mon, October 15, 2012 5:00 pm, Sean Turner
Dan,
After talking it over the preferred* approach to answer the 802.11
request is to include them in the IKEv1 registry (as suggested by
Michael R.) with a tweaked note. Rationale being that if you used what
I suggested you'd have to make sure two registries were updated if a
change was
For my scenario, having hub and spoke doesn't really work. What happens with
multiple organisations, do they each have a hub? - how do they communicate
between them. I'd like to set the challenge of trying to do full mesh - it may
be that we need a mechanism that notifies gateways if one has
Tero,
Gotta ask: Should this draft update RFC 5996? On the one hand, it's
optional and existing implementations don't need to support it. On the
other hand, if you're really trying to deprecate the old RSA raw key
format shouldn't it update the base doc?
Could add an informative reference
On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Tero Kivinen kivi...@iki.fi wrote:
I did send quite a lot of comments to the draft at 2012-09-10, and I
have not seen those taken into the draft yet. Also as I noted in my
email I am quite sure we are still missing some requirements, but as
the current document is
On Oct 17, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Dan Harkins dhark...@lounge.org wrote:
I would be happy to discuss IKEv3. Please let me know if you'll put me
on the agenda and I'll prepare some slides to talk to.
It would be good if you put together a short (less than 15 minutes)
presentation on your
