Will do, although 4106 doesn’t have any either.
Yoav
On Apr 25, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
On Apr 25, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
With this I believe the document is ready for WGLC. I might want to add an
appendix with an example.
Hi
This new version closes (I think) all the open issues. I have removed all
references to GDOI as it has been pointed out that GDOI allocated sender-ID
bits from the visible IV, not the invisible salt. I have replaced all places
where it said “sender ID” with “Salt”. I have made the salt
Replying to myself to prevent others from sending messages to the
internet-drafts and i-d-announce.
On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This new version closes (I think) all the open issues. I have removed all
references to GDOI as it has been pointed out that
And adding the [1]…
On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Replying to myself to prevent others from sending messages to the
internet-drafts and i-d-announce.
On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This new version closes (I think) all
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : ChaCha20, Poly1305 and their use in IKE IPsec
Author : Yoav Nir
On Apr 25, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
With this I believe the document is ready for WGLC. I might want to add an
appendix with an example.
As chair and shepherd: we can't start the WG Last Call on this until we have
examples*s*, given the changes in the -03 to add
