After re-reading the draft I think that I'm also a bit unhappy with the way
the last table
(Section 4.2) is introduced. The draft says that this table is:
Recommendation of Authentication Method described in [RFC7427]
notation.
However, the values from this table are just examples in RFC742
Valery Smyslov writes:
> After re-reading the draft I think that I'm also a bit unhappy with
> the way the last table (Section 4.2) is introduced. The draft says
> that this table is:
>
>Recommendation of Authentication Method described in [RFC7427]
>notation.
>
> However, the values from
After re-reading the draft I think that I'm also a bit unhappy with
the way the last table (Section 4.2) is introduced. The draft says
that this table is:
Recommendation of Authentication Method described in [RFC7427]
notation.
However, the values from this table are just examples in RFC74
No responses yet...
Tero: What would it take to register an “identity” hash function for use with
the EdDSA?
Yoav
> On 5 Apr 2016, at 11:09 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
> Replying to myself...
>
> I’ve been told off-list that it didn’t make sense to introduce the hot, new
> algorithm as a MAY. The
Fine with me
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:09, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> Valery Smyslov writes:
>> After re-reading the draft I think that I'm also a bit unhappy with
>> the way the last table (Section 4.2) is introduced. The draft says
>> that this table is:
>>
>> Recommendation
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of the
IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Guidance for IKEv2
Authors : Yoav Nir
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of the
IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Gui
Yoav Nir writes:
> Tero: What would it take to register an “identity” hash function for
> use with the EdDSA?
I assume you mean new value for the RFC7427 Hash Algorithm registry?
That registry is by expert review, but as "identity" is not
necessarely clear enough for the implementors, I would sugg
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 6:12 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> Yoav Nir writes:
>> Tero: What would it take to register an “identity” hash function for
>> use with the EdDSA?
>
> I assume you mean new value for the RFC7427 Hash Algorithm registry?
> That registry is by expert review, but as "identity" is
