> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:06 PM, David McGrew wrote:
>
>
> Because QKD is not a practical system for Internet security. It has serious
> security issues/challenges and operational limitations on bitrate, range, and
> physical media. It requires a point to point optical link, which is
> typ
Dear David Waltermire,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
ipsecme Session 1 (2:00:00)
Tuesday, Afternoon Session I 1400-1600
Room Name: Charlottenburg I size: 80
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Wouters [mailto:p...@nohats.ca]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 9:43 AM
> To: David McGrew (mcgrew)
> Cc: Waltermire, David A. (Fed); IPsecME WG; Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer); Panos
> Kampanakis (pkampana)
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] Call for adoption on draft-fluhre
Comments below.
> > In contrast, QR-IKEv2 can be used to add postquantum security between
> any two points on the globe, without requiring dedicated fiber, and without
> requiring physical layer security assumptions. It has *fewer* security
> assumptions than draft-nagayama-ipsecme-ipsec-with-qk
Hi Paul,
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, David McGrew wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>> Because QKD is not a practical system for Internet security. It has
>> serious security issues/challenges and operational limitations on bitrate,
>> range, and physic
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Rodney Van Meter wrote:
We were encouraged by the ADs and a few others to rework the draft to focus
more on generic uses of out-of-band generated key material,
but we haven’t managed to put together the right set of hours to get it done.
At least one person said, “It may b
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, David McGrew wrote:
Hi David,
Because QKD is not a practical system for Internet security. It has serious
security issues/challenges and operational limitations on bitrate, range, and
physical media. It requires a point to point optical link, which is typically
dedic
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:06 PM, David McGrew wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Introducing quantum computer resistance in IKEv2 helps to avoid the
>> implications of having sec admins that want to have quantum computer
>> resis
Hi Paul,
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
> wrote:
>
> Introducing quantum computer resistance in IKEv2 helps to avoid the
> implications of having sec admins that want to have quantum computer
> resistance revert back to IKEv1 with shared secrets. The draft adds qua
