Re: [IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05: (with COMMENT)

2017-03-14 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi. I’d like to address the second comment. > On 15 Mar 2017, at 3:33, Stephen Farrell wrote: > - ENCR_NULL IMO ought be MUST NOT - did the WG discuss > that explicitly? If so, can you provide a pointer to the > archive? If not, does it still have to be a MUST? I do > wonder who wants to u

[IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05: (with COMMENT)

2017-03-14 Thread Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http

[IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05

2017-03-14 Thread Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http

[IPsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17: (with COMMENT)

2017-03-14 Thread Ben Campbell
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t