[IPsec] Protocol Action: 'Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Configuration for Encrypted DNS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-14.txt)

2023-05-10 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Configuration for Encrypted DNS' (draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-14.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working Group. The IESG conta

Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-05-10 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Re-, Thanks, Paul. Also added a note to explain "15" in the example. The new version with all the changes shared so far is now online: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike/14/. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Paul Wouters > Envoyé : mercredi 10 mai 20

[IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-14.txt

2023-05-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (IPSECME) WG of the IETF. Title : Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Configuration for Encrypted DNS Aut

[IPsec] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-13: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-10 Thread Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-05-10 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 10 May 2023, Valery Smyslov wrote: I do think that is very confusing. I would prefer to see the field described once to make it more clear there is only one format. Do you think the figure above should be added to the document with fields description? No, I thought using just one fig

Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-05-10 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 10 May 2023, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: Thanks for the changes to address my concerns. The idea here is that the other "1" should also be described here. [Med] That other "1" is about the address count. This is why we are referring to an "address" not "addresses". Made this