Hi Paul,
as author I fully agree that the document is ready for WGLC. Actually,
that's what I said at the meeting.
Thank you for repeating this in the ML (it was too late for me to do it
myself yesterday).
Regards,
Valery.
> Hi,
>
> Valery and Vukasin worked on interop testing a few weeks ago o
Hi,
Valery and Vukasin worked on interop testing a few weeks ago
of draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-09 and after some code
fixes on both implementations we got successful interop on
the success and failure paths.
We believe this document is ready for WGLC
Paul
_
Antony and I discussed this in the hall this morning, and I will work
with him on scoping a 7402-bis.
I will have to see what xml file I can find for this
Bob
On 7/8/24 09:28, Antony Antony wrote:
Hi,
The BEET mode work started around IETF 118. Since IETF 118, I have narrowed
the scope o
Changed milestone "Traffic Flow Confidentiality document to IESG", added
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs to milestone, removed draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs from
milestone.
Changed milestone "Signature algorithm negotiation for IKEv2 to IESG",
resolved as "Done", added draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9593
Title: Announcing Supported Authentication Methods in the
Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
Author: V. Smyslov
Status: Standards
Hi Valery,
Thank you for the update. Is there any intention to provide an implementation?
Best regards
Steffen
From: Valery Smyslov
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 9:51 AM
To: Fries, Steffen (T CST) ; ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [IPsec] Re: draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2, public implementation
availa
Hi,
thank you for providing use cases in the new version of the draft.
I still have some questions about the intended use of the ESP Ping protocol.
I understand from the draft that one of the use cases is a manual check
for ESP connectivity by network operators. This use case is clear for
