Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 9:37 AM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2022, at 23:50, Erik Kline wrote:
> >
> >
> > You could also just say that ASBRs are presumed to be communicating
> within a well-managed environment, are often zero or one hops away from one
> another
el, and IMHO should not be viewed as a violation of
> RFC 8200.
>
> Where this gets interesting is ICMP responses from intermediary routers
> (e.g. traceroute, PMTUD). I'm not sure what to do about this, but I guess
> it's probably not worse than what would happen with an ESP tunnel...
>
&g
I don't understand how "transport mode" can work for non-originated
packets; for IPv6, inserting random headers along the path would violate
8200.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:23 AM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Hello IPSEC,
>
> We've just put out an extensively revised version of our RISAV proposal
>
> > I.e., either this document needs to formally update RFC 4303 by allowing
> any
> > number or another IP protocol number must be requested to the IANA.
>
> As I pointed out in my previous email that is not the case.
>
> The RFC4303 ESP has a Next Header field which contains indicates what
>
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
[+ipsec]
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 2:50 PM The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Light-Weight Implementation
> Guidance
> WG (lwig) to consider the following document: - 'Minimal ESP'
>as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
