Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice

2012-03-22 Thread yogendra pal
Why they may not use this technology ? Even today irrespective of the topology, traffic is intercepted by lawful agencies by using different mechanism (port mirroring, etc...) Thanks, Yogendra Pal Ericsson, India On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Stephen Hanna sha...@juniper.net wrote: Please

Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice

2012-03-22 Thread Yoav Nir
I don't think this is an all-or-nothing choice. You might want a mesh for VoIP, but a star for HTTP, FTP and mail protocols. Or you may want a mesh within your organization, but to trunk and inspect all traffic going somewhere else. On Mar 21, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Stephen Hanna wrote: Please

Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice

2012-03-22 Thread Ulliott, Chris
Cc: IPsecme WG Subject: Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice I don't think this is an all-or-nothing choice. You might want a mesh for VoIP, but a star for HTTP, FTP and mail protocols. Or you may want a mesh within your organization, but to trunk and inspect all traffic

Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice

2012-03-22 Thread Vishwas Manral
Hi Yogendra, I guess the question being raised here is slightly different. The question is should all traffic be first sent to a central point (Campus/ DC etc) inspected (IDS/ IPS/ Firewall) and then allowed to pass to others peers or should there be a direct connection between the peers too -

[IPsec] [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice

2012-03-20 Thread Stephen Hanna
Please comment. Steve -Original Message- From: ipsecme issue tracker [mailto:t...@tools.ietf.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 7:04 PM To: yaronf.i...@gmail.com; draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-prob...@tools.ietf.org Subject: [ipsecme] #219: Star topology as an admin choice #219: Star