Yaron Sheffer wrote:
- Section A.1 should say that the notation used for the example
ticket formats is intended to be pseudo-code, and does not specify
exact octet-by-octet format. (And probably things like
reserved[3] should be removed, since they don't really belong in
pseudo-code
pasi.ero...@nokia.com writes:
- Section 5: Peer vendor IDs cannot be implementation specific -- if
the old gateway sent Vendor ID FOO, the client has to unambiguously
know whether it's allowed to FOO vendor-specific payloads to the new
gateway or not. Probably this should be Not resumed,
At 3:33 PM -0400 8/15/09, Stephen Kent wrote:
At 12:52 PM +0300 8/15/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
C
This document does not specify a mandatory-to-implement or a
mandatory-to-use ticket format. The formats described in the following
sub-sections are provided as useful examples, and implementers are
