...@checkpoint.com
Date: 01/12/2011 03:54 PM
Subject:Re: [IPsec] Issue #202: Token makers generating the same tokens
without synchronized DB
I wonder if there's a way to merge sections 9.2 and 9.4. I think that
using the algorithm in 5.2 as specified in 9.4 is really just an extension
...@ietf.org, Yoav
Nir y...@checkpoint.com
Date: 01/13/2011 09:50 AM
Subject:Re: [IPsec] Issue #202: Token makers generating the same tokens
without synchronized DB
Sent by:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org
Combining the two sections could also make it clearer that 5.2/9.4 may
/in/smoonen
From: David Wierbowski/Endicott/i...@ibmus
To: ipsec@ietf.org ipsec@ietf.org, ipsec-boun...@ietf.org
Cc: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com
Date: 01/11/2011 12:39 PM
Subject:Re: [IPsec] Issue #202: Token makers generating the same tokens
without synchronized DB
On 1/10/11 12:03 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
Greetings.
We have just submitted version -03 of the draft. This closes issues, #198,
#199, #200, and #201.
Which leaves us with just one issue: #202
So far, there have been no posts on this thread. I encourage the
document authors to weigh in on the
Greetings.
We have just submitted version -03 of the draft. This closes issues, #198,
#199, #200, and #201.
Which leaves us with just one issue: #202
= Issue #202: Token makers generating the same tokens without
synchronized DB
Section 10.4 of the draft has a use-case where a
