Envoyé : mercredi 10 mai 2023 18:25
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : Paul Wouters ; The IESG
> ; draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-...@ietf.org; ipsecme-
> cha...@ietf.org; ipsec@ietf.org; kivi...@iki.fi
> Objet : Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-
> add-ike
On Wed, 10 May 2023, Valery Smyslov wrote:
I do think that is very confusing. I would prefer to see the field
described once to make it more clear there is only one format.
Do you think the figure above should be added to the document
with fields description?
No, I thought using just one fig
On Wed, 10 May 2023, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Thanks for the changes to address my concerns.
The idea here is that the other "1" should also be described here.
[Med] That other "1" is about the address count. This is why we are referring to an "address" not
"addresses". Made this
HI Paul,
> > Actually, the format is the same for both request and response,
> > but depending on Num Hash Algs and AND Length and also on Length,
> > some fields may be omitted.
>
> > The most generic format is:
> >
> > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> > +-+-
Paul Wouters
> Envoyé : dimanche 7 mai 2023 22:54
> À : Valery Smyslov
> Cc : 'Paul Wouters' ; 'The IESG'
> ; draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-...@ietf.org; ipsecme-
> cha...@ietf.org; ipsec@ietf.org; kivi...@iki.fi
> Objet : Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-i
ecme-
> cha...@ietf.org; ipsec@ietf.org; kivi...@iki.fi
> Objet : Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-
> add-ike-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
...
> >> #3 Security Considerations
>
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Actually, the format is the same for both request and response,
but depending on Num Hash Algs and AND Length and also on Length,
some fields may be omitted.
The most generic format is:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
#2 Updates RFC 8598
Note: [RFC8598] requires INTERNAL_IP6_DNS (or
INTERNAL_IP4_DNS)
attribute to be mandatory present when INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN
is
included. This specification relaxes that constraint
This clearly u
Hi Paul, all,
Thanks for the review.
Please see inline. Skipped the comments to which Valery replied.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Paul Wouters via Datatracker
> Envoyé : mardi 25 avril 2023 01:21
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-...@ietf.org; ipsecme-cha...
Hi Paul,
thank you for your comments, please see inline.
> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-11: Discuss
>
> --
> DISCUSS:
> -
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https
11 matches
Mail list logo
