2) Can the RIRs live with this proposal as currently written and
implement it?
We have considered this draft during its progress through the IPv6
Working Group and made a number of comments on earlier revisions
concerning the viability of the approaches being proposed at the time.
The draft
3) Separate from 2), are there any areas where the RIRs think some
changes might be useful to consider, based on their experiences and
perspectives? E.g., are there particular operational concerns? Is
the document overly prescriptive in ways that don't necessarily
seem helpful?
4) We note that if the RIRS are to implement this proposal (or something
like it), there may be RIR-internal processes that need to take
place in order to get formal approval to go forward. For example,
a specific proposal may need to be reviewed by the membership at
large and/or
Dear All,
ETSI Plugtest is organizing its 5th IPv6 Interop Event.
The event will be held from 11th - 15th October 2004 at the Sofitel
of Cannes-Mandelieu French Riviera !
Please Register at: www.etsi.org/plugtests/IPv6.htm
Deadline is 24 Sep 2004
TAHI IRISA will provide the following
At 06:49 AM 30/06/2004, Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
As a part of the IESG review, a member of the RIR community has
provided comments on the ULA draft. I will posting those comments to
the mailing list as separate notes shortly. As a part of that review,
Bob I made the decision to split the
At 06:21 AM 1/07/2004, Dan Lanciani wrote:
|It may be that this issue of assignments performed in perpetuity
|vs fixed period renewable assignments should be a matter of
|choice by the client as the time of assignment, and that charge
|applicable to this service
Geoff Huston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|At 06:21 AM 1/07/2004, Dan Lanciani wrote:
||It may be that this issue of assignments performed in perpetuity
||vs fixed period renewable assignments should be a matter of
||choice by the client as the time of assignment, and that
Thus spake Dan Lanciani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|It may be that this issue of assignments performed in perpetuity
|vs fixed period renewable assignments should be a matter of
|choice by the client as the time of assignment, and that charge
|applicable to this service
Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Playing Devil's Advocate, perpetual assignments will also inevitably lead to
|a situation where, after many years (think decades), the majority of
|assignments will be stale because the registrant no longer exists but didn't
|return the assignment. While
