Hi Peter,
Remembering the creation time is not mandatory. It is just one way of
satisfying the constraints. The node can use any other means if it so
desires.
If you are worried about renumbering issues you can set a
lower value for TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME and TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME. An RA
e
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
12.50% |3 | 24.69% |48807 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12.50% |3 | 17.00% |33597 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12.50% |3 | 14.45% |28566 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8.33% |2 | 8.08% |159
Hi Jinmei,
Thanks for the response!
If we remove "stateful" from rfc2462bis, I think we'd also need to
change the name of the bit in rfc2461bis accordingly. Otherwise, the
result would rather be more confusing. So I asked the wg whether
- we should clean up all the occurrences of "stateful" and r
