> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:04:57 +0200,
> Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> If the sum of the prefix length and interface identifier length
>> does not equal 128 bits, the Prefix Information option MUST be
>> ignored. An implementation MAY wish to log a system management
>> (Sectio
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
>
> In fact, RFC2461 is already pretty clear that such a prefix MUST be
> ignored:
>
>If the sum of the prefix length and interface identifier length
>does not equal 128 bits, the Prefix Informa
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:28:55 +0200,
> Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Markku Savela wrote:
>> > This would work just fine, if nodes on internal network take the RA
>> > prefix length as is, and just trunctate their ID-parts from higher
>> > ends (or they
